Objective: To assess the pattern of instructions regarding the ethical requirements given to authors in various Pediatric Dental Journals. Material & Methods: A cross-sectional survey of ‘instructions for authors,’ for analysis of guidelines on ethical processes, was done. Instructions to authors in journals of pediatric dentistry across the globe were reviewed for guidelines with regards tofourteen key ethical issues. Descriptive statistics were used, and results were expressed in percentages as well as numbers. Results: Of the 18journals of pediatric dentistry, all 14 ethical issues were covered by the instructions to authors in only three journals with only 50% of these providing clarity about authorship using ICMJE guidelines. Furthermore, COI declaration was found to be present as mandatory in about 44% of the journals. 38.9% of the sampled journals mentioned guidelines on research misconduct, publication issues such as plagiarism, overlapping/fragmented publications, and availability of raw research data from authors. Guidelines on handling of complaints about editorial team was provided to authors by slightly over 33% of the selected pediatric dentistry titles while handling of complaints about authors and reviewers were mentioned in 16.7 %and 55.6 % of the journals respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of Journals of Pediatric Dentistry did not provide adequate instructions to authors regarding ethical issues.
Objective: To assess the pattern of instructions regarding the ethical requirements given to authors in various Pediatric Dental Journals. Material & Methods: A cross-sectional survey of ‘instructions for authors,’ for analysis of guidelines on ethical processes, was done. Instructions to authors in journals of pediatric dentistry across the globe were reviewed for guidelines with regards tofourteen key ethical issues. Descriptive statistics were used, and results were expressed in percentages as well as numbers. Results: Of the 18journals of pediatric dentistry, all 14 ethical issues were covered by the instructions to authors in only three journals with only 50% of these providing clarity about authorship using ICMJE guidelines. Furthermore, COI declaration was found to be present as mandatory in about 44% of the journals. 38.9% of the sampled journals mentioned guidelines on research misconduct, publication issues such as plagiarism, overlapping/fragmented publications, and availability of raw research data from authors. Guidelines on handling of complaints about editorial team was provided to authors by slightly over 33% of the selected pediatric dentistry titles while handling of complaints about authors and reviewers were mentioned in 16.7 %and 55.6 % of the journals respectively. Conclusion: A significant proportion of Journals of Pediatric Dentistry did not provide adequate instructions to authors regarding ethical issues.